tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1916701795973514807.post1702775945162615157..comments2024-02-20T15:42:43.958+01:00Comments on Doc Madhattan: Waiting the superluminal neutrinos (if they exist!)Gianluigi Filippellihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03480308847295234747noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1916701795973514807.post-23617198082098358392011-09-23T23:11:30.134+02:002011-09-23T23:11:30.134+02:00Superluminal neutrinos change everything.
Bye, bye...Superluminal neutrinos change everything.<br />Bye, bye special relativity.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1916701795973514807.post-27034039809737215442011-09-23T15:29:17.175+02:002011-09-23T15:29:17.175+02:00creation via virtual particles doesn't solve t...creation via virtual particles doesn't solve the stability problem. Virtual particles are only an artificial concept coming from Feynman graphs. All QFTs with tachions are unstable disregarding how one creates tachions.<br />Imaginary mass means negative mass squared, which would imply that the most stable state of a theory is not the vacuum but the tachion. Then we should see a sea of neutrinos everywhere. They are difficult to reveal, but we can tell that there is no ether made of neutrinos.quelarionnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1916701795973514807.post-41086284114536287852011-09-23T15:18:11.357+02:002011-09-23T15:18:11.357+02:00Virtual particles violate causality principle (and...Virtual particles violate causality principle (and others physical principle). It could be that superluminal neutrinos was created by a virtual particle, so the violation of casuality principle is a new proof of model standard, without destruct <b>special relativity</b>, that <b>is not a field theory</b>.Gianluigi Filippellihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03480308847295234747noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1916701795973514807.post-70686702591036185362011-09-23T14:41:25.032+02:002011-09-23T14:41:25.032+02:00I don't understand the comment on the fact the...I don't understand the comment on the fact the neutrinos are not interacting with the EM fields.<br />SR and GR of course include the speed of light as a fundamental scale, but this has nothing to do with the EM interaction. It's just an incident, because the photon is massless.<br />If SR and GR are right, superluminal neutrinos violate causality and make the vacuum unstable. It's not higher order corrections, if masses are imaginary, it's a catastrophe in any case.<br />If SR and GR are wrong, and neutrinos don't violate causality, we should then explain why there is a barrier at v=c that apparently nothing can pass but neutrinos.<br />I don't think one can adapt GR and SR to accomodate tachions and still keep the great results of the Standard Model.quelarionnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1916701795973514807.post-45054285399308894192011-09-23T12:53:42.300+02:002011-09-23T12:53:42.300+02:00That's a very good comment to the news of the ...That's a very good comment to the news of the day!<br />The other news is that everybody is talking about physics... Amazing!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1916701795973514807.post-11609529080795867402011-09-23T11:00:53.119+02:002011-09-23T11:00:53.119+02:00Thanks, Michele!
I've just download and print ...Thanks, Michele!<br />I've just download and print the paper. I read it during the day.Gianluigi Filippellihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03480308847295234747noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1916701795973514807.post-33468549491211797562011-09-23T09:24:00.436+02:002011-09-23T09:24:00.436+02:00Here is the ArXiv paper http://arxiv.org/pdf/1109....Here is the ArXiv paper http://arxiv.org/pdf/1109.4897v1<br /><br />;-)Michelenoreply@blogger.com